<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing Aspect Pointcuts &#8211; is there an easy way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.novoj.net/2008/09/20/testing-aspect-pointcuts-is-there-an-easy-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.novoj.net/2008/09/20/testing-aspect-pointcuts-is-there-an-easy-way/</link>
	<description>Dává je jen zřídka, obvykle jim není moc rozumět a často vám ani k ničemu nejsou.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myšlenky dne otce Fura &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When does your Spring @Transactional attribute apply on CgLib proxies</title>
		<link>http://blog.novoj.net/2008/09/20/testing-aspect-pointcuts-is-there-an-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-24534</link>
		<dc:creator>Myšlenky dne otce Fura &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When does your Spring @Transactional attribute apply on CgLib proxies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.novoj.net/2008/09/20/testing-aspect-pointcuts-is-there-an-easy-way/#comment-24534</guid>
		<description>[...] easy as we usually use Springs&#8217; transaction rollback on tear down testing approach. Though there are solutions to test aspect oriented logic it&#8217;s not without a price. More than that &#8211; we very much got used relying on easy-to-use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] easy as we usually use Springs&#8217; transaction rollback on tear down testing approach. Though there are solutions to test aspect oriented logic it&#8217;s not without a price. More than that &#8211; we very much got used relying on easy-to-use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
